why can't we...?
by SnVsaWVu » Sun, 09 May 2004 12:36:05 GMT
Oka
So I've noticed that Microsoft has FINALLY gotten on the ball and allowed you to download certain office applications from their website as trials and then later convert them into full-blown versions
I've always liked this concept, as it seems the way to go for future software delivery options. However, I'm not sure I like the fact that Microsoft is still excpecting a full retail price for this option.
If I am not buying a product that has been wrapped in pretty packaging and burned in some cd-replication warehouse, then why must I shoulder a full retail cost ? Should there not be some sort of monetary incentive to purchase software this way? Symantec allows you to download their software at a discount if you don't purchase it in the store; as does a few other companies. Some of them offering the product at HALF retail for doing this.
Those of us who have paid for high-speed internet connections should see other perks such as this.
Also, why not make ALL products available this way? Including future versions of Windows and the full versions of Office?
While I'd like to go one step further and ask for the ability to download full retail MS products WITHOUT technical support (even futher driving down cost..) I'm sure this is a pipe dream
Anyone care to share their thoughts on this
Thank
Julien
why can't we...?
by Chris Schatte » Sun, 09 May 2004 13:07:32 GMT
Try this link:
http://www.**--****.com/
ball and allowed you to download certain office
applications from their website as trials and then later
convert them into full-blown versions.
go for future software delivery options. However, I'm
not sure I like the fact that Microsoft is still
excpecting a full retail price for this option.
pretty packaging and burned in some cd-replication
warehouse, then why must I shoulder a full retail cost ?
Should there not be some sort of monetary incentive to
purchase software this way? Symantec allows you to
download their software at a discount if you don't
purchase it in the store; as does a few other companies.
Some of them offering the product at HALF retail for
doing this.
connections should see other perks such as this.
Including future versions of Windows and the full
versions of Office?
ability to download full retail MS products WITHOUT
technical support (even futher driving down cost..) I'm
sure this is a pipe dream.
Re: why can't we...?
by Arie Heinrich » Sun, 09 May 2004 21:11:36 GMT
Hi Julien,
As I'm seeing it, Microsoft is making progress in this area, and work is
done to have more programs for Trial version that can then be turned
to Retail upon purchase.
I agree that some price changes should occur for people downloading the
software but that wouldn't be that much of a discount - i can not see MS
dropping the price in half just for the downloaded version...Symantec
products are 50-100$ for home consumers...we haven't reached this yet
with OS products.
Currently MS is only allowing Full MSDN versions for downloading to
whomever has a MSDN account. This version is not a Retail one - you
can not use it to operate your business - rather Test/Private usages.
Being realistic, I don't think MS will provide full retail download option
but rather continue the Trial-convert-Retail method
My 0.5$ thoughts
Take care,
Arie H
MS MVP
--------------------------------
remove nospam for email
you to download certain office applications from their website as trials and
then later convert them into full-blown versions.
software delivery options. However, I'm not sure I like the fact that
Microsoft is still excpecting a full retail price for this option.
burned in some cd-replication warehouse, then why must I shoulder a full
retail cost ? Should there not be some sort of monetary incentive to
purchase software this way? Symantec allows you to download their software
at a discount if you don't purchase it in the store; as does a few other
companies. Some of them offering the product at HALF retail for doing this.
other perks such as this.
versions of Windows and the full versions of Office?
full retail MS products WITHOUT technical support (even futher driving down
cost..) I'm sure this is a pipe dream.
RE: why can't we...?
by RnJ1c3RyYXRlZA » Mon, 10 May 2004 02:26:02 GMT
Julien - Symantic is worried about competition. They are being Competative
Microsoft is NOT worried about competition. They are being Greedy.
Re: why can't we...?
by Alias » Mon, 10 May 2004 03:38:46 GMT
"Frustrated" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > wrote
Competative.
Greedy. <<<
If they aren't worried about it, how come they sued Lindows?
Alias
Re: why can't we...?
by Rob Schneider » Mon, 10 May 2004 16:35:50 GMT
Of course they are concerned and will handle "threats" to their markets.
That's what companies do and there is nothing wrong with that. The
action they take is what they think, based on a *lot* of thinking, will
maximise their profits ... which again, is their purpose and their job.
Hope this is useful to you. Let us know.
rms
Similar Threads:
1.On calendars why can't I see busy/free data and why can't I us
2.On calendars why can't I see busy/free data and why can't I use OO
When trying to schedule a meeting for anyone in/on my network I can't see
busy/free data because it specifies it cannot be retrieved. It only recently
started this in the last few weeks. How can that be fixed? Also, this past
week I noticed that I can no longer use the Out of Office Assistant. I get a
message stating that 'Your out of office settings cannot be displayed,
because the server is currently unavailable. Try again later.' As far as I
can tell, the server is up and running.
Thanks,
Jason
3.Why can't I "Can't create file"?
4.Why can't I turn certain correction options off /Why can't I turn them on?
Hi Dave,
Good point about explaining to a computer. It is easy :-)
If you open a blank document with autocorrect
capitalization turned off and type "jones" it will be
marked as an error. This happens because the arrangement
(size and shape) of jones doesn't fit in the pattern in
Word's main dictionary. Its a square peg among round
holes.
Say your name is Steavens and we will assume that you know
how to spell it. Word marks it as an error because the
folks that make Word think that Stevens is how you should
spell your name and they didn't provide a round hole for
Steavens.
If you click jones or steavens and select add then you
have just made square hole and Word will not tag them as
errors anymore.
>-----Original Message-----
>Hi
>
>I think we're talking at cross purposese here.
>
>"jones" must be somewhere cos it's getting spotted as a
msitake independant
>of whether 'capitalization' is activated or not (maybe
it's triggered by
>Mr.and/or Mrs.)
>
>Tools>Options>Spelling and Grammar is exactly where I am
in the program and
>it's these options that don't seem to make a difference.
>
>It's always easier to explain infront of a computer but I
hope this is
>clearer now.
>
>
>
>
>"Greg" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > a rit dans le message de
news:
>089b01c36afb$7aa057d0$ XXXX@XXXXX.COM
>> Dave,
>>
>> The first issue is I don't think Word knows how to spell
>> anything but only compares the form of what you type
with
>> a big list of words forms that a programmer fed it. The
>> programmers probably didnt' include jones in the list.
>>
>> The second issue can be corrected by altering the
setting
>> in Tools>Options>Spelling and Grammar.
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> For an English/computer lesson, I want to get the
>> students to turn off all
>>> the correction options and then activate them one by
one to see the
>>> difference.(vive la difference!)
>>>
>>> Problem is, I've come up against the illogic of the
spell- check
>>> again.
>>>
>>> The first option is 'capitalization' and in XP, it is
explained that
>>> this function would capitalize 'jones' in the example
Mr.jones.
>>>
>>> Thing is, it shows up as a mistake whether the option
is ticked or
>>> not.
>>>
>>> This is the first option and I am already stuck.
>>>
>>> If the option is turned off, where is the correction
coming from????
>>>
>>> I've deactivated 'active markers' just in case and
>> checked the automatic
>>> correction settings and there is nothing there which
should be
>>> correcting mr.jones but it is being corrected
nevrtheless.
>>>
>>> _____________________________________________________
>>>
>>> Heres the other side of the coin.
>>>
>>> The misused words options should pick up on 'Do it
like I say' as an
>>> error according to Microsoft's own documentation
('like' is a
>>> preposition and not a conjunction).
>>>
>>> Would you believe that whether the option is on or off,
>> it doesn't get
>>> picked up on my computer.
>>>
>>>
__________________________________________________________
>>> _________________
>>>
>>> I don't know why we all worry so much about which
spell checker is
>>> running cos they aint worth much anyway!!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> .
>
>
>.
>
5.why can't i hear the party i call and why can't they hear me when.
When I use OUTLOOK to dial a contact for voice communication through my
modem, the modem dials the number(I can't hear a ring through the headset)
the phone dialed rings, but once connected there is no audio on either end. I
can't hear my contact and they can't hear me even though OUTLOOK shows us as
connected.
Whats UP???
6. Why can't I see what I am writing?
7. Why can't I move a graphic in Word?
8. Why can't you use Microsoft office 2003 to open microsoft offi