error code: 114 Attempt to access item beyond bounds of memory (Signal 11)

cobol

    Sponsored Links

    Next

  • 1. OT:: No level is safe, zero tolerance
    I find the thread particularly odd considering that Robert IMMEDIATELY sent a note saying that his original note was intended for another group. -- Bill Klein wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com "tlmfru" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > wrote in message news:XH0_i.3193$ XXXX@XXXXX.COM ... > While OT things are usually interesting and thought-provoking, this one is > TOO FAR off-topic to be carried on here, and besides seems to be mostly > sniping by the "down with Wagner" school of thought. Why don't you guys > carry it on in the newsgroup that Robert meant to post it to? I'm quite > sure he'll tell you which one. > > PL > > > Howard Brazee < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > wrote in message > news: XXXX@XXXXX.COM ... >> On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:43:00 -0600, "HeyBub" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > wrote: >> >> >There's nothing wrong with hypocrisy. 85% of gynecologists are men. >> >> I see zero relationship between those two statements. > >
  • 2. COBOL to Java conversion
    Hello, Is there any businesses that perform COBOL to Java conversions? Does anyone know what their going rates are (more or less)? Thanks __________________________ R.Gonzalez F3RSolutions.com
  • 3. [O/T] Embedded SQL and MS ACCESS Dates
    "me" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > wrote in message news: XXXX@XXXXX.COM ... [skipped] > Because OpenESQL can access any relational database and each database has I "like" those b.rds to name some pure commercial products starting with "Open". Did anybody had an idea to patent/trademark the word "Open" for opensource community ? i.e. if some product name is started from "Open" they should provide all souces under GPL or something like that :-))) Really the question is if anybody knows opensource SQL precompiler for Cobol (even not finished / non-working, even just parser) ? I have my own but I'm afraid to publish it because it's garbage. It's very limited, I'm not parsing SQL statements, indicator variables never been implemented etc. I took a look at mysql/postgres ESQL but it's tied to C/C++ recognizing C/C++ datatypes in parser so it's not easy to take it as a "base"... Regards, Sergey

Re: error code: 114 Attempt to access item beyond bounds of memory (Signal 11)

Postby Wiggy » Wed, 06 Aug 2003 08:37:54 GMT





Server Express docs can be found online at the Micro Focus SupportLine site
@
 http://www.**--****.com/ 
22indx.htm

Check the User's Guide, Chapter 7.

Simon.



Similar Threads:

1.114 Attempt to access item beyond bounds of memory - (Signal 11)

Hi,

I'm trying to run a cobol program and calling "DBOPEN" with parameters
such as IMAGE-BASE, IMAGE-PASSWORD, IMAGE-MODE, IMAGE-STATUS.

I'm trying to open the database with read mode.

When I animate the program, at this specific point of calling "DBOPEN"
, Attempt to access item beyond bounds of memory - (Signal 11) occurs.
I'm not able to proceed further.

Help needed in this case.

With Kind Regards,
Vinod

2.Microfocus Cobol - Execution error code: 114

Has anyone else had this problem?

We have recently upgraded our Unix box to HP-UX 11 & Microfocus Cobol
OCDS 4.1.40. All our cobol sources were recompiled under the new
version of OS and OCDS.

Also worth mention is that the same source program also runs on
various other flavours of Unix OS & Cobol, e.g. AIX 4.33/4.1.20, HP-UX
10.20/4.1.20, HP-UX 10.20/4.1.40 without any problems.

Having recompiled I am getting the following error when I run the
program:

-------------------------------------------------------
HPD/Micro Focus Cobol Errors                                        
                                                                    
                                                                    
Execution error : file '/opt/users/programs/ifa/IFA54RN/PFS2150.gnt'
error code: 114, pc=0, call=107, seg=0                              
114     Attempt to access item beyond bounds of memory (Signal 10)  
                                                                    
HP/MF COBOL Version: v4.1.40                                        
HP-UX hp9000 B.11.00 A 9000/806                                     
pid: 4483 gid: 20 uid: 116                                          
-------------------------------------------------------

I have managed to isolate where the program is falling over, here is a
section of the code:

-------------------------------------------------------
MOVE WC-KEY(WC-IND) TO WPFS9260-KEY.              
CALL "PFS9260" USING WS-COMMON,                   
                     WPFS9260-PARAMETERS.         
IF WPFS9260-APPLIED-TO = "Y"                      
   GO TO CD999-EXIT.                              
MOVE WC-KEY(WC-IND) TO WPFS9290-KEY.              
DISPLAY "NOW MOVED WC-KEY..."
MOVE WC-NEW-DOCAPPNO(WC-IND) TO WPFS9290-APPLY-TO. <-----------
offending line
CALL "PFS9290" USING WS-COMMON,                   
                     WPFS9290-PARAMETERS,         
                     FFS031-SAVE-RECORD.          
IF WPFS9290-ERROR = "Y"                           
   GO TO CD999-EXIT.                              
-------------------------------------------------------

In the code above, the program falls over with the error mentioned
above on the line indicated.

Interestingly though, if I put in a DISPLAY statement just prior to
the offending line, as shown in the code above, the program runs
through without any problem.

The other thing is that if I run just the .int, (renamed the .gnt)
then the program works fine. So it appears that the problem lies in
the gnt and something is getting corrupted. We've done the usual of
updating the machine to the latest OS patches.

Does anyone have any ideas of how to get around this. I don't think
the problem lies with the code (although not a 100& sure), since this
same program is compiled on various different platforms running our
other versions of Unix and Cobol. So if there were a problem in the
code, I'd expect to get the same problem on our other unix boxes.

Anyway - if anyone can give me some ideas to try out, I'd really
appreciate it.

thanks
phil

3.Signal 11 error (core)

This statement gives core dump

  if( pError->pFileName[0] != '\0' )

can someone suggest why ?

This statement was failing in all our unix environments so we changed
it to:

if( !(pError->pFunctionName == NULL))

It worked for some environments then now again it failed in 1
environment.
 
Any idea ?

All memory allocation have been done.

4.pthread_create returns error code 11

i have a code that uses pthread, but when i use pthread_create()
method it returns error code 11. I have found out that this is often
because of exceeding the THREAD_MAX limit for the process. But i want
to use only about 24 threads at a given time, and i destroy the
threads (or atleast i thought so) can someone tell me what i am doing
wrong here it would be of great help! thanks!

 for (i=0; i<no_pairs; ){
        for (j=0; j<MAX_THREADS && i<no_pairs; j++,i++){
            data[j].a = seeds[i/no_seeds];
            data[j].b = seeds[i%no_seeds];
            data[j].N = N;
            data[j].L = nones+nzeros;
            data[j].p1 = get_string (seeds[i/no_seeds], nzeros
+nones-1);
            data[j].p2 = get_string (seeds[i%no_seeds], nzeros
+nones-1);
            data[j].results = pairs[i];
            rc = pthread_create (&threads[j], &attr, run_actree, (void
*)
&data[j]);
            if (rc) {
                printf ("ERROR; return code from pthread_create() is
%d
\n", rc);
                exit (-1);
            }
        }
        for (k=0; k<j; k++){
            rc = pthread_join (threads[k], &status);
            if (rc) {
                printf("ERROR; return code from pthread_join() is %d
\n", rc);
                exit(-1);
            }
        }
    }

    pthread_attr_destroy (&attr);

Above is the main loop i create threads in, MAX_THREADS = 24

Any help as to where i am going wrong is greatly appreciated.

5.comp.lang.ada Digest, Vol 19, Issue 114

6. oracle10g SQLBEX giving 114 with Oracle Dynamic SQL Method 4 (ora9 works well)

7. errore 114

8. Server Express 64bit and Oracle 9i problem (114) on AIX 5.2



Return to cobol

 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guest