baracuda spam firewall

Exchange 2000

    Sponsored Links


  • 1. report for all sent items
    Is there a third party or Microsoft tool for gathering all of a users sent email. My HR department wants to look at a users sent email for the past month or so. I backup my email server nightly and the logs flush. The user has been savvy enough to delete all sent email, clear the deleted item, and clear the recove deleted items. Any help is appreciated.
  • 2. Error, "The name could not be resolved. The action could not be completed".
    Hi gurus, I have an Outlook 2002 client which talks to his mailbox on an Exchange 2000 server. Whenever he tries to go through the steps to add a second mailbox (in addition to his own, when opening Outlook), he receives the error: "The name could not be resolved. The action could not be completed". This error occurs as soon as he hits the "Add" button, before he even gets a chance to add in the mailbox name. For Outlook, this is an Exchange Server properties advanced setting. Very odd.
  • 3. All users receiving multiple copies of email sent to a global distribution list
    We have a strange problem; When any one uses the "all district staff" email distribution list, I find that multiple copies of the same message is sent to staff on different days and times but with the date and time stamp of the original date and time the message was sent.
  • 4. LAN vs WAN
    We currently have a W2K Server part of a domain that is connected via a WAN. Our problem is that our corporate Exchange Server is on the other side of the WAN and we have experienced problems with loss of connectivity. I am trying to convince the IT department that we should have an Exchange Server local so we are not dependent on them. My question is there any advice on Best Practice or articles that would back me up on justifying this. Your experienced and expert device would be appreciated.

baracuda spam firewall

Postby Drew Halevy » Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:23:25 GMT

Greetings All,

We currently using GFI MailEssentals, and are a happy with it, but the 400 
model looks interesting.


The system got a good review


Is anyone using one these? comments? concerns?



RE: baracuda spam firewall

Postby QnJpYW4gSGVzc2VsaW5n » Fri, 04 Mar 2005 06:29:04 GMT

We have been using one for about 10 months now and I will swear by it over 
other products. We tested MailEssentials for about a month and it didn't do 
near as good of job as the barracuda. Before that we had Surfcontrol's email 
filter and for the high cost it wasn't nearly as good. 


Re: baracuda spam firewall

Postby Drew Halevy » Fri, 04 Mar 2005 06:38:46 GMT

Thanks for the info; how much time per day do you have to spend on dealing 
with Spam? -Drew

"Brian Hesseling" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > wrote in 

Similar Threads:

1.Question on Barracuda spam firewall

I currently use GFI but I started looking for another solution after
learning that GFI cannot block IP address ranges, Korea for example,
while allowing white listed senders from Korea to still send emails
from those IP addresses. I contacted Barracuda support and the rep said
their device could blacklist an ip address or a range of IP's of smtp
servers while still allowing email originating from those ip addresses
through if the sender was on the white list. I am seeing 99% of spam
originating from foreign countries. I work for a school and almost zero
percent of our email comes from outside of the US.

I'd love to hear from Barracuda owners.


2.Exchange 2k3 and Barracuda Spam Firewall

I have a Exchge2k3 server and a Barracuda spam firewall. They are both
setup on the internal network and then we have statics configured on
the firewall. I'm running into problems where domains are blocking our
email because it is showing a in the header.  Also, the
address in the header is the ip address for the Symantec firewall
appliance instead of the actual address of the mail server. So it
looks like the outgoing and incoming addresses are different. I
thought I could get around this by making the exch server forward all
outgoing email through the barracuda. However, it doesn't seem to be
working. My question is:

Can someone help with the steps for getting the exchg server to
forward all outgoing email through the barracuda so that the incoming
and outgoing ip addresses are the same? I'm thinking this is why the is coming up in the header as well.


3.Barracuda Spam Firewall?

4.Edge Transport Role and Internal Spam Firewall

I would like to know if this design is possible. Put the Edge Transport 
server in the DMZ then point to a spam firewall then to the hub transport 
server. Also, if this design does work, would the spam mail be delivered to 
the junk email folder of the client if intelligent messaging filter was 

5.Barracuda spam firewall

Having issues with a barracuda spam firewall 2000 and a small business server 

Emails stop comning in . I have to restart the exchange services and restart 
world wide web services. The emails come thru.

Is there any special that needs to be done on the server? So that I don't 
have to restart the services.

6. SMTP relay, closed firewall, spam, sessions not showing

7. Firewall Ports Require behind firewall port

8. SPAM bypassing our SPAM Filter.

Return to Exchange 2000


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guest