?? And that affects the X-Box how exactly? Honestly Macs and OS-X
are barely even a blip on Microsoft's radar for desktop computers
(Apple is still languishing at around 2-3% of worldwide sales), hardly
something for MS to get worried about.
Macs made up a *VERY* small proportion of the processors that Motorola
sold. Besides, they didn't die at all, just split the chip business
off so that it could be more focused (ie the exact opposite of what is
being proposed here). And Freescale (the spin-off semiconductor
company) is doing fairly well for themselves, $250M profit on $1.6B
revenue for the third quarter of this year. I don't think that
they're missing Mac sales too much.
MS doesn't buy chips off the spot market for the XBox, they have a
guaranteed supply as per their contract! Intel will provide the
original XBox chips for as long as the MS contract requires them too.
Same goes for IBM providing the XBox360 chips and the next generation
chips beyond that.
I'm in full agreement with the others, absolutely no point at all in
MS getting involved in the processor market, there are more than
enough competent suppliers out there who have already coughed up the
several billion dollars required for fabs and the R&D teams. MS will
probably get involved more closely on the specs and architecture of
the chips for their next-gen console (sorta like Sony's involvement
with the Cell chip for the PS3), but the actually processor design and
production will be handled by someone with expertise in that field.
----------------------------
Tony Hill
hilla <underscore> 20 <at> yahoo <dot> ca