Hi Joke_Bloke, You dreamed: << You cannot compare Mono on Linux and .NET developed by Microsoft for Windows. Mono was created with very limited specs and no help from Microsoft as a multiplatform version of .NET. >> I've posted my code over and over again, it's quite small, Ingo Molnar provided no source code for his claims, ...How bogus were his claims anyways, I have to wonder. Imagine if four guys ( five, if we could count Ingo ), generated a report like this: 2,008 Simultaneous threads acheived. 57 Seconds per 100,000 simultaneous threads spawned/completed. I'd find that interesting precisely because it was written in different languages, using diffent libraries and run on different kernels. You don't like that comparison ? What exactly do you want to see and why ? You mentioned only " Linux 2.4 kernel threads ", But Bailo is running 2.6 not 2.4 . Are you saying he needs to update his libaries or something ? Do you have these libaries ? Why don't you just run Ray's code then ? ( Even Bailo has done that... the only one to have run another's code ) You quoted Ingo: << ...on the default x86 kernel, it needed roughly 500 MB of RAM to do this test with the IRQ-stacks patch applied. >> So ? We don't have Ingo's code, do we ? He was using dual P4s with a custom kernel, I'm using off-the-shelf software ( Windows XP Home Edition ), My 200-buck box has only 256 Megs of RAM, the L2 cache is only 128 K, I'm also using about 20 megs of system-RAM for Direct Draw 7, ...Think about it. Re: Me not doing whatever it is that you want, You concluded: << If that wasn't obvious to you, as it seems from your post, you are much more stupid than I suspected or you are deliberately ignoring that fact to support your drivel. >> What " drivel " am I trying to support ? How to disintegrate the 2.6 kernel on demand ? What " brilliance " are you trying to support ? The notion that I can't read the cobwebs in your head ?
I can't read the cobwebs in your head.
1 posts
• Page 1 of 1
- Exchange 2000
- powershell
- WINDOWS VISTA
- jobs
- PERL
- cad
- editor
- MS Office Access
- filemaker
- MS Office Access
Jump to:
Next
I can't read the cobwebs in your head.
by Jeff_Relf » Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:45:44 GMT
Similar Threads:
1.open and read functions (can't make 'read' work..)
Hi,
I'm trying to read from the txt file 'ip.packets.2.txt' using the read
function. It seems everything ok, but I get a -1 when executing
>>bytesr = read(fdo1, bufread, 2);
The 'open' function returns the file dsc 3. So this seems ok..
Any idea what might be wrong?
Thanks!
FBM
#define BUFSIZE 1024
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
double now() {
struct timeval t;
gettimeofday(&t,NULL);
return ((double)t.tv_sec + (double)t.tv_usec/1000000.0);
}
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
int fdo1;
double t;
char * pathname;
ssize_t bytesr;
void * bufread;
pathname = argv[1];
fdo1 = open("ip.packets.2.txt", O_RDWR);
t = now();
bytesr = read(fdo1, bufread, 2);
t = now() - t;
printf("time %.3f\n", t);
exit(0);
}
Hi Bailo ,
You ask :
" What do ' dumb terminals ' have to do with Linux ? "
You say : " All you need is Mozilla and Linux " .
A box like that on campus would just grow cobwebs .
3.Linux head-to-head with Windows NT, ready to overtake Windows 98
4.Linux head-to-head with Windows NT 4.0
5.[News] Interviews with Head of Bluewhite64 GNU/Linux and Head of Eclipse
6. Linux head to head with Windows NT
1 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guest