running 4.3.2 should i bother upgrading?

ms windows

    Sponsored Links

    Next

  • 1. Avoiding/deleting Spam
    Do I understand correctly that with MailWasher, even if it automatic I have to run the program separately from, in addition to, Eudora? Does sending back bounce messages really help? It says something about advertising " please register. As an incentive, our own advert on the software will be removed", -- does is it move or is it obtrusive -- do I have to look at it all the time, or only when I'm in the MailWasher program. What about SpamKiller? Which do you like more? Anything else that's better? What about the junk watch in Eudora 6? Thanks Meirman If emailing, please let me know whether or not you are posting the same letter. Change domain to erols.com, if necessary.
  • 2. Eudora 6: Ads don't show up in sponsored mode
    Hi there, as wrote in the subject, ads don't show up in sponsored mode. Eudora 6 told me there is a not better specified problem with that and if won't be solved it will, soon or later, switch to light mode. Does anyone know how I can fix it? Krige
  • 3. eudora 6 combining messages in replies
    When I reply to a message using 6.0, sometimes it combines my message with another one (seemingly random, it's from a different personality no less). Both originators are put into the 'to" field, both subjects are combined in the subject header, and both messages are quoted in the reply. It's doing it right now--no matter what message I reply to, it wants to combine it with this same other letter. Anyone else had this problem?
  • 4. multiple IDs, upgrading Eudora
    I currently have multiple IDs running under WinXP Pro. Sample properties tags from the short-cut is: "C:\Program Files\Qualcomm\Eudora\heather\Eudora.exe" "C:\Program Files\Qualcomm\Eudora\win\Eudora.exe" Will I need to change that to keep the mailboxes working properly from the short-cuts or can I just install Eudora 6.0 to program files\qualcomm\eudora\ and have it execute on each of the seperate tags? Thanks. I'm nervous about upgrading because I don't want to break anything.
  • 5. upgrading Eudora 6
    Hi every body, In order to install Eudora 6 do I have to uninstall Eudora 5 before or it can be upgraded like that? Thx

running 4.3.2 should i bother upgrading?

Postby sky » Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:59:47 GMT

i have been running 4.3.2 for years and have had little or no trouble. 
should i bother upgrading? is version 6 worth it? if so, why?

thanks


Re: running 4.3.2 should i bother upgrading?

Postby Ogden Johnson III » Wed, 12 Jan 2005 01:34:22 GMT




Depending on how "little" that "little" of "little or no trouble"
is, why should you if you're happy with what you've got?

is version 6 worth it?

Only *you* can answer that question, depending on what *you* want
and don't want from your email client.

if so, why?

A recap of all the changes in Eudora since 4.3.2 - the three
"major" releases of 5.x, the, to date, three "major" releases of
6.x, [excluding the x.x.xx "bug fix releases for both the 5s and
6s] would be impossible.  I hope you have remembered them.

For the current 6.2 version, you can find some features info
here:

 http://www.**--****.com/ 
 http://www.**--****.com/ 

If you're really determined to do your research, you could try
using the older version installers still available to install
them, check the release notes for what changed from the previous
version, then uninstall them.  Here's where you can find those:

 http://www.**--****.com/ 
-- 
OJ III
[Email to Yahoo address may be burned before reading.
Lower and crunch the sig and you'll net me at comcast.]

Re: running 4.3.2 should i bother upgrading?

Postby Katrina Knight » Wed, 12 Jan 2005 02:22:45 GMT



Do you want any of the newer features? If you think you might, I'd advise 
downloading the current version and trying it out. At that point you can 
decide whether it offers anything you like better, and if it does whether 
you want to run it in light or sponsored mode or whether you want to pay 
for a year's subscription. (Be sure to use a new program directory when 
you install it. Using the same data directory is okay, although, as always 
when making major changes, I'd recommend backing up at least eudora.ini 
and preferably all your data files first.) If you don't want the new 
version, then you can just get rid of it and go back to what you're using 
now. As OJ mentioned already, you're the only one who can really decide if 
it is worth it to you. I can tell you that I'd never choose to use 4.3.2 
in preference to 6.2, but your needs, likes and dislikes are likely to be 
different from mine. 

-- 
Katrina



Re: running 4.3.2 should i bother upgrading?

Postby bandhphoto » Wed, 12 Jan 2005 03:53:52 GMT

<i have been running 4.3.2 for years and have had little or no trouble. 
should i bother upgrading? is version 6 worth it?>

I went from 4.3.2 to 6 and while I've turned Moodwatch off, the Junk options
are very useful for me. I get as many as 100 e-mails/day since I use it for
work and filtering the junk makes thing very manageable. 

There'll be new ugly icons when you first install the new version, but if you
copy or move the EudoraOldIcons file from Extrastuff to the rooot Eudora
directory, the view will be more familiar.
 - --

regards,
Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video
 http://www.**--****.com/ 
 XXXX@XXXXX.COM 

Re: running 4.3.2 should i bother upgrading?

Postby Bob Bailey » Wed, 12 Jan 2005 05:09:00 GMT






If you are a moderate to heavy email user: Yes.

It's always worthwhile to stay relatively current. If you have a problem the 
usual advice is to get current at which point it's painful because you did 
not set the timing. 



Re: running 4.3.2 should i bother upgrading?

Postby Wayne Fulton » Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:08:18 GMT

In article < XXXX@XXXXX.COM >,  XXXX@XXXXX.COM  
says...


I'm still using 4.2.2, the last version before the ad bloatware started.

I find Eudora tremendously versatile and powerful, really essential to 
do what I need to do.  But 4.2.2 already does all of that, IMHO.  I 
have never needed MoodWatch one single time :-) 


Re: running 4.3.2 should i bother upgrading?

Postby remove-xxxx » Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:59:57 GMT


I have been using 4.3.2 until 2 weeks ago.

The main reason for the switch was the new ISP requires SMTP authentication.
This feature is not available in version 4.xx

After making the change I absolutely thrilled with spam filtering.

Farouk Dindar

Re: running 4.3.2 should i bother upgrading?

Postby daniel12 » Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:52:03 GMT

In article <uqGEd.21928$ XXXX@XXXXX.COM >,  XXXX@XXXXX.COM  says...



  SMTP Authentication is in Eudora Versions 4.2+
   http://www.**--****.com/ 
  --
  Over and Out
  Daniel Jacobson


Re: running 4.3.2 should i bother upgrading?

Postby Steve » Sat, 15 Jan 2005 05:34:59 GMT

I'm still miffed for shelling out for a v5 upgrade and seeing no new
compelling functionality.  I think they jumped major release numbers
strictly for marketing.  I haven't used v6, but didn't see anything
worth paying for in their product descriptions.

Steve








Re: running 4.3.2 should i bother upgrading?

Postby Bill » Sat, 15 Jan 2005 07:17:18 GMT




I paid for version 5.0 and found it wouldn't run 24/7 on any computer or
operating system...it freezes if there is ANY kind of network issue that
prevents Eudora from accessing the internet for even a few moments (like
if the DSLAM drops the DSL link for a minute during maintenance or
whatever). Eudora does not recover from this kind of crash...it locks up
tight until it is closed and re-opened.

All versions since v5.0, including the latest, does the same thing.

This is a known issue with how Eudora interacts with Windows and checks
for a network connection. If it thinks there's a good connection, but
there isn't, it locks up Eudora.

But version 4.3.2, which I'm still using, is rock solid and doesn't
freeze if there is a connection issue. It merely reports an error in its
own taskbar, and then tries to connect again after x minutes. If it was
a brief interruption, v4.x will then continue as normal and report the
error in the log file, as it should.

I should mention that I have noticed that v6.x will NOT crash if it
thinks there is no connection, and the option "Don't check without a
network connection" is enabled. However, Eudora will sometimes sit idle
and never check for hours on end if it "thinks" there is no connection,
even when the network is up and running just fine. That defeats the
whole purpose of running it 24/7 though.




I still run v4.3.2 because of the above connection issues with newer
versions. It works perfectly, and newer versions don't really offer
anything of use to me. I don't get any spam at all, so the junk filters
offer nothing to me.

If they ever fix the issue, I'll consider upgrading and paying again.
Until then I'll keep my trusty v4.

Re: running 4.3.2 should i bother upgrading?

Postby Ogden Johnson III » Sat, 15 Jan 2005 08:16:17 GMT








Whereas I saw several compelling improvements in 5.0 that I
thought justified the major release number, and shelling out
$2mumble bucks.

<ObPlatitude>

In software, as in life, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

</ObPlatitude>

[Be glad, I coulda used the strokes chestnut.]
-- 
OJ III
[Email to Yahoo address may be burned before reading.
Lower and crunch the sig and you'll net me at comcast.]

Re: running 4.3.2 should i bother upgrading?

Postby Steve » Sat, 15 Jan 2005 13:26:35 GMT

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:16:17 -0500, Ogden Johnson III 

Which compelled you - MoodWatch or Eudora Sharing Protocol?

Steve

Re: running 4.3.2 should i bother upgrading?

Postby Katrina Knight » Sun, 16 Jan 2005 00:54:02 GMT



Why in the world did you do that without checking whether you wanted the 
new version first? When you can read the list of changes and try out the 
new version at no cost, it doesn't make a lot of sense to just blindly 
keep renewing your subscription for updates. 


 
I don't know what their logic with version numbers was, but personally, I 
think they probably should have made the change to 5.0 a version earlier. 
4.3 had major changes in the way it worked. 5.0 didn't. It would have made 
sense to me to have called 4.3 "5.0". 

-- 
Katrina


Re: running 4.3.2 should i bother upgrading?

Postby Ogden Johnson III » Sun, 16 Jan 2005 02:13:04 GMT






Neither, because a) my major Sharing principle regarding Eudora
is that b) as with the majority of other Eudora 5.x+ users, I
share their thinking that MoodWatch is almost  Bill Gatesesque in
being an absolutely ridiculous implementation of a resource hog
that no one in his right mind would want in the first place.

[For those old enough, Bob anyone?]

Seriously, at this late date I can't list specifically the
features new in 5.0 [or those that changed something I didn't
like in EP]  that prompted me to upgrade from EudoraPro
4.whatever.
-- 
OJ III
[Email to Yahoo address may be burned before reading.
Lower and crunch the sig and you'll net me at comcast.]

Re: running 4.3.2 should i bother upgrading?

Postby Ogden Johnson III » Sun, 16 Jan 2005 02:18:24 GMT






 

Good thought, possibly, Katrina.  IEAMRC [If Extremely Aging
Memory Recalls Correctly], I stayed with EP 4.2.something and
never did 4.3.  [Addendum to my just-made response to Steve ...]
Maybe if I'd gone to 4.3, I might not have been so fast to go to
5.0.  Who knows?  Who cares?  We're talking a $2something buck
expenditure made, what?, damned near a decade ago?
-- 
OJ III
[Email to Yahoo address may be burned before reading.
Lower and crunch the sig and you'll net me at comcast.]

Similar Threads:

1.Should I even bother upgrading?

I'm a bit leery about upgrading my computer to the new Vista and even more so 
now that I've read some of the problems it has. Should I even risk loading 
it? Do the pros outweigh the cons?

2.Upgrading to Windows 7 -- Why Bother?

3.Should I Bother Upgrading to 6.2?

I will be soon purchasing a Logitech Quick Cam Pro 4000 
camera for business communication with an associate in 
Colorado.  My Linksys WRT54G Router is Universal Plug and 
Play compatible and I have broadband access.  My current 
OS is XP Pro SP2.  I currently have Messenger 4.7 
installed.  Do you see a benefit in upgrading to 6.2 
prior to purchasing and installing the camera?  Should my 
business partner also have the same version of Messenger 
installed as well?  I know he is running XP Pro SP2 as 
well.

4.Tried to run Vista upgrade advisor, and got cannot run winstat

I am running XS and ran vista upgrade advisor

"Colin Barnhorst" wrote:

> Run it where?  What OS?  What kind of computer?
> 
> "Frank S" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > wrote in message 
> news: XXXX@XXXXX.COM ...
> > What must I do to get past this error msg. 
> 
> 
> 

5.upgrade wssv2 to wssv3: Run the pre-upgrade scan tool

6. something that bothers me

7. New hard drive, shall I bother moving?

8. This bothers me. Vista ME



Return to ms windows

 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guest