I'm looking at a new system, and as I look at prices I'm beginning to wonder if a 64 bit clawhammer chip might be worth it. The system will need to dual boot WinXP and FreeBSD. Any one have any experince with such a system? Jason
I'm looking at a new system, and as I look at prices I'm beginning to wonder if a 64 bit clawhammer chip might be worth it. The system will need to dual boot WinXP and FreeBSD. Any one have any experince with such a system? Jason
Not yet... It would be a wonderful convenience if the page on the AMD64 port < http://www.**--****.com/ ; actually had links to things such as installation instructions. Something like the Installation Instructions, < http://www.**--****.com/ ~bmah/relnotes/5.2-RELEASE/installation-amd64.html> or the hardware notes... < http://www.**--****.com/ ~bmah/relnotes/CURRENT/hardware-amd64.html> -- output = reverse("moc.enworbbc" "@" "enworbbc") http://www.**--****.com/ "I have yet to see any problem, however complicated, which, when you looked at it in the right way, did not become still more complicated." -- Poul Anderson
Athlon 64 is only supported in FreeBSD 5.X but FreeBSD 5.X is not as stable as 4.X. The ISO image is available at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-amd64/
The two build machines used to build FreeBSD/amd64 packages are very stable under heavy load, so indications are good for general stability of 5.2 on amd64. Kris
Hello, Will a machine with 64 bit SPARC AMD CPU will run the sparc64 installation of linux ? I know that,for example, when you install with AMD 64 bit **Intel** processors , you use x86_64 arch; so the question here is sparc64 suitable for 64 bit AMD SPARC? rgds, MR
2.Sybase ASE Linux for AMD Opteron 64 bit
Hi, Does anyone know if Sybase has or plans to release a ASE version for 64-bit AMD and/or Itanium? If not, does anyone know if I will run into problems running the Linux x86 version of ASE on my Fedora server running an AMD Opteron Dual Core processor? Thanks, Matt
3.fread differences on AMD v/s intel on 64 bit linux
I have a script that behaves VERY differently on Linux 64bit (RHEL 4 and RHEL 5) boxes with AMD chips than Intel chips. The AMD box behaves find when using the 32 bit OS. The problem is time. The AMD box takes MANY times longer to run the script compared to the Intel and 32bit AMD box. Profile shows the biggest chunk of change happening on fread statements. This elicits a very simple question: Is there a difference between how fread works on an AMD box with 64 bit Linux than Intel with same 64 bit linux? I'm extremely confused on the matter. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Ben
4.matlab 7.0.4 slow on AMD-64 3700+ running linux
Hi Folks, Matlab seems to be running slow on my new laptop, a AMD-64 3700+ running Fedora Core 3. I have 1 GB of memory, and am using a 32-bit kernel: 2.6.9-1.667. mean(bench(10)) = 0.8967 0.6614 0.6181 1.6055 1.3180 2.9597 Can anyone running on a AMD-64 tell me if these values are slow? If so, can anyone tell me why? -Derek
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 81 guest