Possibly something itchy about which partition and cylinder number for swap?
Possibly something itchy about which partition and cylinder number for swap?
Hi, I just tried to run the latest sol10 install, usualy i chose upgrade and off i go. But somehow b54 doesn't even offers me an upgrade install. Anyone else has that problem? -- Barbie - Prayers are like junkmail for Jesus I have seen things you lusers would not believe. I've seen Sun monitors on fire off the side of the multimedia lab. I've seen NTU lights glitter in the dark near the Mail Gate. All these things will be lost in time, like the root partition last week. Time to die.
Barbie LeVile < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > writes: I just did b54 upgrade no problems, so you probably have to provide more details. Bye, Dragan -- Dragan Cvetkovic, To be or not to be is true. G. Boole No it isn't. L. E. J. Brouwer !!! Sender/From address is bogus. Use reply-to one !!!
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:28:26 -0400 Ok, hrmm, lets see downlaoded the isos from sun, software 1 and 2, i don't bother with the install cd, and don't need the languages. setup an installserver for them, added my system and booted from the net, install started, since no rules are configured, the normal install rutines starts, but never gives the option to do an upgrade install, neither does it checks if the system is upgradeable. Same happens when i boot off the cds itself. System is a dual cpu blade 1000. -- Barbie - Prayers are like junkmail for Jesus I have seen things you lusers would not believe. I've seen Sun monitors on fire off the side of the multimedia lab. I've seen NTU lights glitter in the dark near the Mail Gate. All these things will be lost in time, like the root partition last week. Time to die.
"Don't get an upgrade choice" usually points to something "interesting" about your boot environment.. Multiple boot disks? Multiple root partitions? Filesystems in /etc/vfstab that it can't mount? "unusual" ways of partitioning the OS ... I think any of those can confuse the installation program to the point that it's not certain that it has all of your boot environment available, so it won't offer the upgrade choice. -- Darren Dunham XXXX@XXXXX.COM Senior Technical Consultant TAOS http://www.**--****.com/ Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 19:03:30 GMT Not realy, just mirrored boot disk, and the upgrade worked fine from sol 9 to 10 up to now. s0 swap s1 / s3 /var s4 /opt s5 /home since i run homes local on this machine -- Barbie - Prayers are like junkmail for Jesus I have seen things you lusers would not believe. I've seen Sun monitors on fire off the side of the multimedia lab. I've seen NTU lights glitter in the dark near the Mail Gate. All these things will be lost in time, like the root partition last week. Time to die.
Possibly something itchy about which partition and cylinder number for swap?
Barbie LeVile < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > writes: You will first need to uninstall all the zones on your system. (Upgrades of sysystems with zones are not yet supported) Casper -- Expressed in this posting are my opinions. They are in no way related to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems. Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may be fiction rather than truth.
On 14 Apr 2004 21:21:27 GMT Ahh! Yes that would be basicaly the only realy configuration difference since the previous upgrade. /me runs off to try -- Barbie - Prayers are like junkmail for Jesus I have seen things you lusers would not believe. I've seen Sun monitors on fire off the side of the multimedia lab. I've seen NTU lights glitter in the dark near the Mail Gate. All these things will be lost in time, like the root partition last week. Time to die.
Ugh. I hope this means "not yet supported because this is a beta version". If Sun has given up on maintenance updates and the equivalent is to upgrade, and if upgrades of zones are not supported, then that would make zones pretty painful to use IMHO. - Logan
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 23:53:02 +0200 Yap, that fixed the non upgrad problem And the scroll wheel works out of the box nicely too. -- Barbie - Prayers are like junkmail for Jesus I have seen things you lusers would not believe. I've seen Sun monitors on fire off the side of the multimedia lab. I've seen NTU lights glitter in the dark near the Mail Gate. All these things will be lost in time, like the root partition last week. Time to die.
Logan Shaw < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > writes: Obviously yes. (I suppose that theoretically they have until update 1 of Solaris 10 to address this) I'm surprised there was no mention in the release notes. Casper -- Expressed in this posting are my opinions. They are in no way related to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems. Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may be fiction rather than truth.
1.Unable to upgrade to Sol Express B54 on SB1000
I'm trying to upgrade an SB1000 from Solaris 10 3/05 to Solaris Express B54 with no success. The installer gets to the point where it is "Gathering upgrade information" and then a dialog pops up with the message: "Error!" "Could not reinitialize system state. Please exit the installer and restart the installation." Once I select 'Exit' a terminal window opens and I can try restarting the installation -- no joy. Any ideas? [It just occurred to me this might not be the correct place to ask this question -- if not, guidance will be appreciated.] Thanks, -- HZ
2.Live Upgrade Problem from Sol8 to Sol10
Hi I am trying to upgrade from Sol8 to Sol10 using Liveupgrade feature...I am encountering the following error...can someone help resolve... lucreate sol8 /:/dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0:ufs /usr:/dev/dsk/ c1t1d0s3:ufs sol10 [bwprd]# lucreate -c sol8 -m /://dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0:ufs -m /usr:/dev/dsk/ c1t1d0s3 :ufs -n sol10 Discovering physical storage devices Discovering logical storage devices Cross referencing storage devices with boot environment configurations Determining types of file systems supported Validating file system requests ERROR: device <//dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0> does not exist ERROR: device <//dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0> is not available for use with mount point </> ERROR: cannot create new boot environment using file systems as configured ERROR: please review all file system configuration options ERROR: cannot create new boot environment using options provided [bwprd]# lucreate -c sol8 -m /:/dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0:ufs -m /usr:/dev/dsk/ c1t1d0s3: ufs -n sol10 Discovering physical storage devices Discovering logical storage devices Cross referencing storage devices with boot environment configurations Determining types of file systems supported Validating file system requests Preparing logical storage devices Preparing physical storage devices Configuring physical storage devices Configuring logical storage devices Analyzing system configuration. No name for current boot environment. Current boot environment is named <sol8>. Creating initial configuration for primary boot environment <sol8>. WARNING: /etc/lib/lu/lubootdev: ERROR: Unable to determine the boot device for this system. WARNING: Unable to obtain root device directly from boot prom; attempting to access boot device settings directly. WARNING: Unable to determine root device by accessing boot device settings directly. ERROR: Unable to determine root device for current BE. ERROR: Cannot determine the physical boot device for the current boot environment <sol8>. Use the <-C> command line option to specify the physical boot device for the current boot environment <sol8>. ERROR: Cannot create configuration for primary boot environment. [bwprd]# /usr/sbin/lu
3.Sol10: Unable to do a live upgrade from Sol9
Arno Schneider wrote: > I am unable to do an live upgrade from sol9 to sol10. After the luupgrade i > got the messages that 19 packages failed to install. And f.e. the > /etc/inittab on the sol10 boot environment is not updated. When i look > in the logs i can see the following msgs: > > Doing pkgadd of SUNWvolr to /. > installf: ERROR: relative pathname in link specification </etc/rc0.d/K05volmgt> > installf: ERROR: relative pathname in link specification </etc/rc1.d/K05volmgt> > installf: ERROR: relative pathname in link specification </etc/rc2.d/K05volmgt> > installf: ERROR: relative pathname in link specification </etc/rc3.d/S81volmgt> > installf: ERROR: relative pathname in link specification </etc/rcS.d/K05volmgt> > pkgadd: ERROR: class action script did not complete successfully > pkgadd: ERROR: missing entry in contents file for </a/etc/rc0.d/K05volmgt> > > Installation of <SUNWvolr> failed (internal error) - package > > > Any hints? Which live upgrade package did you use? The one from Sol9 or the one from Sol10? You need to use the one from the version you are upgrading to. In this case Sol10. /Roger -- Roger Gustavsson roger.gustavsson (_at_) teliasonera.com
4.Solved! [was: Unable to upgrade to Sol Express B54 on SB1000]
Removing the entry for the second disk from /etc/vfstab but leaving the disk physically connected allowed the install for Nevada Build 54 to proceed to completion. The failure caused by the phantom /dev/dsk/c2* entry remains a Huge Freakin' Mystery. Thank you to James and Ian for valuable suggestions. -- HZ
5.Legato server upgrade (7.3.1 on Sol9 => sol10)
I have a strange problem upgrading our EBS server OS from Solaris 9 to Solaris 10. The system has run almoust three years on Solaris 9 with EBS 7.x, currently 7.3.1. The hardware is V240 with SE3310 as adv_disk type cache and L25 with two LTO2 tape drives. About 150 clients. Now I broke the sol9 root mirror, and did full install of sol10 to the offbroken part. All fine, OS boots and works, but when I install and start EBS 7.3.1 (ie. 7.3 install and patches) on sol10, the nsrexecd processes newer go to backround (waited ~10 minutes) and so EBS boot script newer got past nsrexedc start. And according truss, the nsrexecd prosesses just sit idle, the first waiting for the second to write something back. EBS works still nicely if I boot the old sol9 partition. My guess is, that it is some kind of identity problem, but what? The new incarnation has same ip and name on same interface on same physical machine! EBS (client) starts fine on other sol10 machines. -- XXXX@XXXXX.COM , University of Helsinki, Computing Centre
6. Windows 7 (Vista7) Upgrade Woes : Beware the 20 hour Windows 7 upgrade
7. Upgrading Linux Fedora 11 v/s upgrading to Vista7
8. Windows 7 (Vista7) Upgrade Woes : Beware the 20 hour Windows 7 upgrade
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guest