Sol10 b54 upgrade

unix

    Next

  • 1. /tmp is chmod 0755 in zones
    Hi. This morning I brought my system up-to-date with regards to patches. Ie. I installed all the missing patches with the help of pca. I then rebooted the newly patched liveupdate boot environment. I now find, that I cannot run GNU screen in the non-global zones anymore: --($ ~)-- LC_ALL=C /opt/csw/bin/screen Cannot make directory '/tmp/uscreens': Permission denied --($ ~)-- ls -lad /tmp drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 360 Sep 19 09:26 /tmp As you can see, /tmp is 0755, and not 1777, as it should be (or as it at least used to be). I have that problem on multiple physical systems and in multiple zones. So it must be something general. Would anyone know why that might be happening? Thanks a lot, Michael

Re: Sol10 b54 upgrade

Postby Beardy » Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:30:31 GMT




Possibly something itchy about which partition and cylinder number for swap?


Sol10 b54 upgrade

Postby Barbie LeVile » Fri, 16 Apr 2004 03:18:06 GMT

Hi,

I just tried to run the latest sol10 install, usualy i chose upgrade and
off i go.
But somehow b54 doesn't even offers me an upgrade install.

Anyone else has that problem?

-- 
Barbie - Prayers are like junkmail for Jesus

I have seen things you lusers would not believe.
I've seen Sun monitors on fire off the side of the multimedia lab.
I've seen NTU lights glitter in the dark near the Mail Gate.
All these things will be lost in time, like the root partition last
week. Time to die.

Re: Sol10 b54 upgrade

Postby Dragan Cvetkovic » Fri, 16 Apr 2004 03:28:26 GMT

Barbie LeVile < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > writes:


I just did b54 upgrade no problems, so you probably have to provide more
details.

Bye, Dragan

-- 
Dragan Cvetkovic, 

To be or not to be is true. G. Boole      No it isn't.  L. E. J. Brouwer

!!! Sender/From address is bogus. Use reply-to one !!!

Re: Sol10 b54 upgrade

Postby Barbie LeVile » Fri, 16 Apr 2004 03:55:11 GMT

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:28:26 -0400




Ok, hrmm, lets see
downlaoded the isos from sun, software 1 and 2, i don't bother with the
install cd, and don't need the languages.

setup an installserver for them, added my system and booted from the
net, install started, since no rules are configured, the normal install
rutines starts, but never gives the option to do an upgrade install,
neither does it checks if the system is upgradeable.

Same happens when i boot off the cds itself.

System is a dual cpu blade 1000.


-- 
Barbie - Prayers are like junkmail for Jesus

I have seen things you lusers would not believe.
I've seen Sun monitors on fire off the side of the multimedia lab.
I've seen NTU lights glitter in the dark near the Mail Gate.
All these things will be lost in time, like the root partition last
week. Time to die.

Re: Sol10 b54 upgrade

Postby Darren Dunham » Fri, 16 Apr 2004 04:03:30 GMT




"Don't get an upgrade choice" usually points to something "interesting"
about your boot environment..

Multiple boot disks?
Multiple root partitions?
Filesystems in /etc/vfstab that it can't mount?
"unusual" ways of partitioning the OS
...

I think any of those can confuse the installation program to the point
that it's not certain that it has all of your boot environment
available, so it won't offer the upgrade choice.

-- 
Darren Dunham                                            XXXX@XXXXX.COM 
Senior Technical Consultant         TAOS             http://www.**--****.com/ 
Got some Dr Pepper?                           San Francisco, CA bay area
         < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >

Re: Sol10 b54 upgrade

Postby Barbie LeVile » Fri, 16 Apr 2004 04:08:47 GMT

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 19:03:30 GMT




Not realy, just mirrored boot disk, and the upgrade worked fine from sol
9 to 10 up to now.

s0 swap
s1 /
s3 /var
s4 /opt
s5 /home since i run homes local on this machine


-- 
Barbie - Prayers are like junkmail for Jesus

I have seen things you lusers would not believe.
I've seen Sun monitors on fire off the side of the multimedia lab.
I've seen NTU lights glitter in the dark near the Mail Gate.
All these things will be lost in time, like the root partition last
week. Time to die.

Re: Sol10 b54 upgrade

Postby Beardy » Fri, 16 Apr 2004 05:26:43 GMT




Possibly something itchy about which partition and cylinder number for 
swap?


Re: Sol10 b54 upgrade

Postby Casper H.S. Dik » Fri, 16 Apr 2004 06:21:27 GMT

Barbie LeVile < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > writes:



You will first need to uninstall all the zones on your system.

(Upgrades of sysystems with zones are not yet supported)

Casper
-- 
Expressed in this posting are my opinions.  They are in no way related
to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems.
Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may
be fiction rather than truth.

Re: Sol10 b54 upgrade

Postby Barbie LeVile » Fri, 16 Apr 2004 06:53:02 GMT

On 14 Apr 2004 21:21:27 GMT





Ahh! Yes that would be basicaly the only realy configuration difference
since the previous upgrade.
/me runs off to try


-- 
Barbie - Prayers are like junkmail for Jesus

I have seen things you lusers would not believe.
I've seen Sun monitors on fire off the side of the multimedia lab.
I've seen NTU lights glitter in the dark near the Mail Gate.
All these things will be lost in time, like the root partition last
week. Time to die.

Re: Sol10 b54 upgrade

Postby Logan Shaw » Fri, 16 Apr 2004 07:50:11 GMT




Ugh.  I hope this means "not yet supported because this is a beta
version".  If Sun has given up on maintenance updates and the
equivalent is to upgrade, and if upgrades of zones are not supported,
then that would make zones pretty painful to use IMHO.

   - Logan

Re: Sol10 b54 upgrade

Postby Barbie LeVile » Fri, 16 Apr 2004 08:43:25 GMT

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 23:53:02 +0200





Yap, that fixed the non upgrad problem
And the scroll wheel works out of the box nicely too.


-- 
Barbie - Prayers are like junkmail for Jesus

I have seen things you lusers would not believe.
I've seen Sun monitors on fire off the side of the multimedia lab.
I've seen NTU lights glitter in the dark near the Mail Gate.
All these things will be lost in time, like the root partition last
week. Time to die.

Re: Sol10 b54 upgrade

Postby Casper H.S. Dik » Fri, 16 Apr 2004 16:55:10 GMT

Logan Shaw < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > writes:



Obviously yes.  (I suppose that theoretically they have until update 1
of Solaris 10 to address this)

I'm surprised there was no mention in the release notes.


Casper
-- 
Expressed in this posting are my opinions.  They are in no way related
to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems.
Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may
be fiction rather than truth.

Re: Sol10 b54 upgrade

Postby Tim Lines » Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:26:25 GMT

Thank you!  I had the same problem!





Similar Threads:

1.Unable to upgrade to Sol Express B54 on SB1000

I'm trying to upgrade an SB1000 from Solaris 10 3/05 to Solaris Express 
B54 with no success.

The installer gets to the point where it is "Gathering upgrade 
information" and then a dialog pops up with the message:

"Error!"  "Could not reinitialize system state. Please exit the 
installer and restart the installation."

Once I select 'Exit' a terminal window opens and I can try restarting 
the installation -- no joy.

Any ideas?

[It just occurred to me this might not be the correct place to ask this 
question -- if not, guidance will be appreciated.]

Thanks,
-- 
HZ

2.Live Upgrade Problem from Sol8 to Sol10

Hi
I am trying to upgrade from Sol8 to Sol10 using Liveupgrade
feature...I am encountering the following error...can someone help
resolve...

lucreate  sol8  /:/dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0:ufs  /usr:/dev/dsk/
c1t1d0s3:ufs  sol10



[bwprd]# lucreate -c sol8 -m /://dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0:ufs -m /usr:/dev/dsk/
c1t1d0s3
:ufs -n sol10
Discovering physical storage devices
Discovering logical storage devices
Cross referencing storage devices with boot environment configurations
Determining types of file systems supported
Validating file system requests
ERROR: device <//dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0> does not exist
ERROR: device <//dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0> is not available for use with mount
point </>
ERROR: cannot create new boot environment using file systems as
configured
ERROR: please review all file system configuration options
ERROR: cannot create new boot environment using options provided
[bwprd]# lucreate -c sol8 -m /:/dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0:ufs -m /usr:/dev/dsk/
c1t1d0s3:
ufs -n sol10
Discovering physical storage devices
Discovering logical storage devices
Cross referencing storage devices with boot environment configurations
Determining types of file systems supported
Validating file system requests
Preparing logical storage devices
Preparing physical storage devices
Configuring physical storage devices
Configuring logical storage devices
Analyzing system configuration.
No name for current boot environment.
Current boot environment is named <sol8>.
Creating initial configuration for primary boot environment <sol8>.
WARNING: /etc/lib/lu/lubootdev: ERROR: Unable to determine the boot
device for this system.
WARNING: Unable to obtain root device directly from boot prom;
attempting to access boot device settings directly.
WARNING: Unable to determine root device by accessing boot device
settings directly.
ERROR: Unable to determine root device for current BE.
ERROR: Cannot determine the physical boot device for the current boot
environment <sol8>.
Use the <-C> command line option to specify the physical boot device
for the current boot environment <sol8>.
ERROR: Cannot create configuration for primary boot environment.
[bwprd]# /usr/sbin/lu

3.Sol10: Unable to do a live upgrade from Sol9

Arno Schneider wrote:

> I am unable to do an live upgrade from sol9 to sol10. After the luupgrade i
> got the messages that 19 packages failed to install. And f.e. the
> /etc/inittab on the sol10 boot environment is not updated. When i look
> in the logs i can see the following msgs:
> 
> Doing pkgadd of SUNWvolr to /.
> installf: ERROR: relative pathname in link specification </etc/rc0.d/K05volmgt>
> installf: ERROR: relative pathname in link specification </etc/rc1.d/K05volmgt>
> installf: ERROR: relative pathname in link specification </etc/rc2.d/K05volmgt>
> installf: ERROR: relative pathname in link specification </etc/rc3.d/S81volmgt>
> installf: ERROR: relative pathname in link specification </etc/rcS.d/K05volmgt>
> pkgadd: ERROR: class action script did not complete successfully
> pkgadd: ERROR: missing entry in contents file for </a/etc/rc0.d/K05volmgt>
> 
> Installation of <SUNWvolr> failed (internal error) - package
> 
> 
> Any hints?

Which live upgrade package did you use? The one from Sol9 or the
one from Sol10?

You need to use the one from the version you are upgrading to. In
this case Sol10.


/Roger

-- 
Roger Gustavsson
roger.gustavsson (_at_) teliasonera.com

4.Solved! [was: Unable to upgrade to Sol Express B54 on SB1000]

Removing the entry for the second disk from /etc/vfstab but leaving the 
disk physically connected allowed the install for Nevada Build 54 to 
proceed to completion.

The failure caused by the phantom /dev/dsk/c2* entry remains a Huge 
Freakin' Mystery.

Thank you to James and Ian for valuable suggestions.
-- 
HZ

5.Legato server upgrade (7.3.1 on Sol9 => sol10)

	I have a strange problem upgrading our EBS server OS from
	Solaris 9 to Solaris 10.

	The system has run almoust three years on Solaris 9 with 
	EBS 7.x, currently 7.3.1. The hardware is V240 with SE3310
	as adv_disk type cache and L25 with two LTO2 tape drives.
	About 150 clients.

	Now I broke the sol9 root mirror, and did full install of
	sol10 to the offbroken part. All fine, OS boots and works,
	but when I install and start EBS 7.3.1 (ie. 7.3 install
	and patches) on sol10, the nsrexecd processes newer go to
	backround (waited ~10 minutes) and so EBS boot script newer
	got past nsrexedc start. And according truss, the nsrexecd
	prosesses just sit idle, the first waiting for the second
	to write something back.

	EBS works still nicely if I boot the old sol9 partition.

	My guess is, that it is some kind of identity problem, but what?
	The new incarnation has same ip and name on same interface
	on same physical machine!

	EBS (client) starts fine on other sol10 machines.
-- 
 XXXX@XXXXX.COM , University of Helsinki, Computing Centre

6. Windows 7 (Vista7) Upgrade Woes : Beware the 20 hour Windows 7 upgrade

7. Upgrading Linux Fedora 11 v/s upgrading to Vista7

8. Windows 7 (Vista7) Upgrade Woes : Beware the 20 hour Windows 7 upgrade



Return to unix

 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guest