/var/sadm/pkg direcotry Q

unix

    Next

  • 1. blastwave and older solaris releases ?
    We have 2 servers running solaris 2.6 Is blastwave.org usable with this release ? Looks like only solaris 8 & 9 packages are built. There's not much info on blastwave.org web site. Thanks
  • 2. newbie - using find command
    2004-09-3, 13:36(-00), T: [...] > I want somehow to find all the instances of *.pdf where there is an original > *.ps file and remove the *.ps file [...] /usr/xpg4/bin/find /root/dir -type f -name '*.pdf' \ -exec /usr/xpg4/bin/sh -c 'rm -f "${1%.pdf}.ps"' {} {} \; -print -- Stephane
  • 3. How to change 'Generic' version?
    I need to downgrade from Generic_108528-20 to Generic_108528-18. This is running Solaris 8. I don't know exactly what that is or how to change it. Is this version-specific? Thanks to all for your help.

/var/sadm/pkg direcotry Q

Postby aK » Mon, 27 Dec 2004 12:16:29 GMT

Since the pkginfo files in the /var/sadm/pkg/pkg_name is not being touched
if i remove /var/sadm/pkg/pkg_name/save dir, removing the save direcotory is
not going to effect when i run pkgrm or patchrm?  or is the pkginfo files
being called only when i run the command pkginfo, showrev -p and
patchadd -p?

what is the save dir for anyway?




-- 
****PLEASE REMOVE "_SPAM_SUCKS" before reply



Re: /var/sadm/pkg direcotry Q

Postby Casper H.S. Dik » Mon, 27 Dec 2004 18:31:49 GMT

"aK" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > writes:


In S10, removing the save directory will prevent you from installing
Solaris zones.


For patch backups and, in S10, for copies of "editable" files so the
zones are populated with clean copies and not copies from the
global zone.


Casper
-- 
Expressed in this posting are my opinions.  They are in no way related
to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems.
Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may
be fiction rather than truth.

Re: /var/sadm/pkg direcotry Q

Postby aK » Fri, 31 Dec 2004 01:01:29 GMT

what happens in SOLARIS 9 if i remove the save dir though?  is it going to
affect future installation/removal if i remove the save dir?  or it would be
ok since pkginfo file still would stay there?







touched
is



Re: /var/sadm/pkg direcotry Q

Postby Casper H.S. Dik » Fri, 31 Dec 2004 02:05:34 GMT

"aK" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > writes:


SHould be fine; but most stuff is in patch specific directories; so
it's safest to remove those.

Casper
-- 
Expressed in this posting are my opinions.  They are in no way related
to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems.
Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may
be fiction rather than truth.

Similar Threads:

1./var/sadm/pkg is very huge

Hello.

I noticed that my /var/sadm/pkg is rather big. It's currently about 1.7g.
Can I deleted no longer required "save" directories from there (like
/var/sadm/pkg/SUNWzfsu/save)?

Thanks,

Alexander Skwar

2./var/sadm/pkg

If /var/sadm/pkg is inadvertently evacuated,

is the machine effectively headed for a reinstall?

.

3.pkg - recreated /var/sadm/install/contents

For some unknown reason, /var/sadm/install/contents is missing
on a couple of our systems, making pkginfo and friends useless.
A web search has not turned up any method for recreating the
database.

So, is there a magic set of commands that I can run to
repopulate that ugly beast?

Linolil

For example; if an RPM database gets corrupt on a linux system.

rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__db*
rpm -vv --rebuilddb

4.Repost: Solaris Live Upgrade: questions about /var/sadm

Sorry for the report, seems like my news reader misbehaved (Ah, MSFT!)

 According to the solaris FAQ:

--------8<-----------------

|3.40) Why does installing patches take so much space in /var/sadm?

    All the files that are replaced by a patch are stored under
    /var/sadm/patch/<patch-id>/save so the patch can be safely
    backed out.  Newer patches will save the old files
    under /var/sadm/pkg/<pkg>/save/<patch-id>/undo.Z, for each package
    patches.

    You can remove the <patchdir>/save directory provided you also
    remove the <patchdir>/.oldfilessaved file.  Newer patches will not
    install a .oldfilessaved file.

    Alternatively, you can install a patch w/o saving the old
    files by using the "-d" flag to installpatch.

|3.41) Do I need to back out previous versions of a patch?

    No, unless otherwise stated in the patch README.
    If the previous patch installation saved the old
    files, you may want to reclaim that space.

    Patches can be backed out with (Solaris 2.6+):
     patchrm <patch-id>

    or in earlier releases:

     /var/sadm/patch/<patch-id>/backoutpatch <patch-id>

    Backoutpatch can take an awful long time, especially when the
    patch contained a lot of files.  This is fixed in later versions
    of backoutpatch.

---------------->8---------------------------

Prior to doing the live upgrade, I would like to minimize the size of my
root partition
(containing /var in my case) Can I safely remove all patches (not just the
save directories)
from /var/sadm/patches or will live upgrade do it automatically ?

I presume that after a solaris upgrade, the liste of installed patches on
the system will be NULL ?

Another last point, does "back out patch" mean to go back to the state
BEFORE the patch was applied ?
I don't understand the 3.41 paragraph. What does it mean ? It seems to mean
that whenever you apply a new
patch, you should go back to the previous version before installing ?

Ex: Original package = blabla-01

Apply patch blabla-02  (BlaBla-01 saved)

You now want to apply patch blabla-03.

Does question 3.41 ask: "if you need to install patch blabla-03 you should
first back ou to blabla-01 ?"

If so, what do you do if the README tells you that you have to, but you
REMOVED the save directory ?

Thanks !


5.Solaris Live upgrade: questions about /var/sadm/patch

 According to the solaris FAQ:--------8<-----------------|3.40) Why does
installing patches take so much space in /var/sadm?    All the files that
are replaced by a patch are stored under    /var/sadm/patch/<patch-id>/save
so the patch can be safely    backed out.  Newer patches will save the old
files    under /var/sadm/pkg/<pkg>/save/<patch-id>/undo.Z, for each package
patches.    You can remove the <patchdir>/save directory provided you also
remove the <patchdir>/.oldfilessaved file.  Newer patches will not
install a .oldfilessaved file.    Alternatively, you can install a patch w/o
saving the old    files by using the "-d" flag to installpatch.|3.41) Do I
need to back out previous versions of a patch?    No, unless otherwise
stated in the patch README.    If the previous patch installation saved the
old    files, you may want to reclaim that space.    Patches can be backed
out with (Solaris 2.6+):     patchrm <patch-id>    or in earlier releases:
/var/sadm/patch/<patch-id>/backoutpatch <patch-id>    Backoutpatch can take
an awful long time, especially when the    patch contained a lot of files.
This is fixed in later versions    of
backoutpatch.---------------->8---------------------------Prior to doing the
live upgrade, I would like to minimize the size of my root partition
(containing /var in my case) Can I safely remove all patches (not just the
save directories)from /var/sadm/patches or will live upgrade do it
automatically ? I presume that after a solaris upgrade, the liste of
installed patches on the system will be NULL ?Another last point, does "back
out patch" mean to go back to the state BEFORE the patch was applied ? I
don't understand the 3.41 paragraph. What does it mean ? It seems to mean
that whenever you apply a newpatch, you should go back to the previous
version before installing ?Ex: Original package = blabla-01Apply patch
blabla-02  (BlaBla-01 saved)You now want to apply patch blabla-03.Does
question 3.41 ask: "if you need to install patch blabla-03 you should first
back ou to blabla-01 ?" If so, what do you do if the README tells you that
you have to, but you REMOVED the save directory ?Thanks !


6. Cleaning Up /var/sadm

7. frequency alphabet for files in /var/sadm/install/contents

8. for huge "recommended" patch, not enough room in /var/sadm/patch



Return to unix

 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guest