two nics - two networks

Windows

    Next

  • 1. Remote Desktop Connection Problem!!
    Hi all!! I have 2 pcs with both havnig Win2k Professional Edition installed. I have recnelty installed Remote Desktop Connection on both of them Now whenever i try to open remote connection on any one of the pC it gives error message that " The Client Could Not Conneect To the remote computer Remote Connections might not be enabled or computer might be busy to accept new connections ............." Some body help me out.. What to do and how to do :( Regards, ASAD
  • 2. VPN behind Cisco NAT
    Is there a step-by-step guide for NAT-T, VPN behind NAT. I have Server 2003 behind cisco 2600 NAT. What would I do to setup VPN if both NICs are on the same segment/network (i.e. 192.168.0.0)? XXXX@XXXXX.COM
  • 3. Drive mapping over a WAN
    "mpwells3" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > wrote in message news: XXXX@XXXXX.COM ... > I have 2 servers in 2 locations Server A and Server B > They are members of different domains > I need to share a text file between them that is a real-time log file of an application on server B. > Server A needs to be able to pull this log file every minute > > The old system worked, but both computers were on the same domain. How can I get around this? > > If I map drives, and the WAN link flickers, the drive goes away and the transfer fails > > Can I use UNC between domains? Maybe with a sync'd user? The domain model is used for central account validation and to control the logon process. It has no effect on making network connections. To successfully make a network connection, two conditions must be met: 1. The IP addressing structure must be such that the two machines can "see" each other. 2. The credentials offered by one machine (logon account / password) must be acceptable to the other machine.
  • 4. ICS working but modem is crazy !
    I have three w2k pro and one w98 on a small network and ICS is working...too well ! The modem keeps dialing every 5 mins ! At first, I thought it was because of a virus. But my computers are cleaned and it keeps doing it. The only trick I found is disabling "dial-on demand" option. But now, we have to bother the same user everytime we want to access the Internet ! I would like to keep clicking on IE to access the Internet without asking for permission... Any ideas about what causes the modem to ring continuously Thank
  • 5. ? Launch VPN conn. using Scheduled Tasks, or a script ?
    I would like to be able to automate the launch of a VPN connection. Once per night, this scheduled task or script would launch a VPN connection, leave it open for a predetermined length of time, and then destroy the connection. I have not found a way to do this from the GUI or the CLI, so I'm suspecting that scripting is the answer. But I have not found any online examples of this type of script helpful. Any pointers to get me started in the right direction would be much appreciated. Thanks. -andrew

two nics - two networks

Postby Auddog » Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:57:48 GMT

I have a windows 2003 server with one nic (192.168.100.x).  We just 
purchased a second company that's in our building.  Can I add a second nic 
and configure it to there network ip scheme (192.168.25.x) so that I can 
share one server?  I want to share the server, just not the information on 
the server.  Will either of the networks be able to one another if I don't 
bridge the networks cards?  Thanks for any help you can provide.

A



Re: two nics - two networks

Postby Danny Sanders » Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:35:31 GMT

There are problems associated with having 2 NICs on a DC.

Why not just add them to your network?


hth
DDS







Re: two nics - two networks

Postby Auddog » Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:53:18 GMT

I would like to have one employee of the new company be able to access some 
of the information.  But I don't want to store all their information on my 
server.  I have read that I will need to have two different subnets to make 
this work.  If that is the case how will windows 2003 know which network to 
talk to for AD?  Will there be other problems?












Re: two nics - two networks

Postby Danny Sanders » Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:59:49 GMT

>I would like to have one employee of the new company be able to access some 

Use ADMT to migrate the users from the domain in the new company and add 
them to your existing domain.
Not sure where "some" of the information is located on your domain but you 
allow them access to it by using NTFS security.


Not sure what kind of server the information is stored on in the current 
domain. DC? run dcpromo to remove AD and make it a member server. Then add 
it to your domain and use this server to store their data on.
Member server? Just remove the server from the existing domain and add it to 
your domain and use this server to "store their information on".


 >I have read that I will need to have two different subnets to make

Typical branch office set up is to place a DC in the branch office, define a 
subnet for the branch office, Move the DC into the site OU and the clients 
in that site authenticate to the DC in that site.

What you want is to have the newly acquired office as a site on your domain. 
You don't want to multihomed your DC.

hth
DDS














Re: two nics - two networks

Postby Auddog » Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:10:07 GMT

Thanks for giving me the straight answer.  It appears that I have a little 
work ahead of me.  Thanks once again.

A


















Re: two nics - two networks

Postby Phillip Windell » Sun, 18 Feb 2007 01:00:02 GMT

reating a new IP network segment is not, and should never be the first thing
you do to protect resources. Resources can be perfectly protected on a single
subnet LAN (remember LANs used run on Netbuei and IPX/SPX). You protect
resources first by using what provides the resource to start with. Files you
protect with NTFS, Web and FTP are protected by the Web/FTP Server and NTFS
combined, Databases are protected by the Database Server's own native security
and by the security built into the Application that access the database.

Protecting resources by blocking traffic at Layer4 is the last thing you do and
is only a "rough" and "crude" protection that is not very granular at all,...and
often "breaks" things as often as if does anything else.

--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com

The views expressed (as annoying as they are, and as stupid as they sound), are
my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft, or anyone else associated
with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------


"Auddog" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > wrote in message
news:%23csIW4% XXXX@XXXXX.COM ...



Similar Threads:

1.Two NICs, Two networks, secure websites

Hi!

I have a Cisco router (provided by the ISP) that offers 29 usable IP's.
 One of the public IP's is set to be the WAN IP of a simple SOHO
Linksys router that then creates a private network 192.168.1.0.  There
is a Linux server with Apache on the private network.  Port forwarding
on the Linksys router allows SSL access to secure web pages,
unencrypted HTTP, SSH, etc. to the Linux server.  This all is working
OK.

I need to have a 2nd SSL site running on the same Linux server.  So, I
installed a 2nd NIC and connected it to the Cisco router and used one
of the available public IP's.  I cannot connect to the new public IP
(via the new NIC), but can still connect to everything described in the
1st paragraph above.

I can ping out each of the interfaces (e.g. ping -I eth0 yahoo.com  and
  ping -I eth1 yahoo.com both work).  The results of route are:

Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
Iface
AAA.BBB.CCC.160 *               255.255.255.224 U     0      0        0
eth1
192.168.1.0     *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0
eth0
127.0.0.0       *               255.0.0.0       U     0      0        0
lo
default         192.168.1.1     0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0
eth0

On the server, I can do   lynx https://192.168.1.2 and lynx
https://AAA.BBB.CCC.164.

>From outside of the server, https://AAA.BBB.CCC.163 works now, but
https://AAA.BBB.CCC.164 does not.  What needs to be done to allow
https://AAA.BBB.CCC.164 to work?  And/or, what can I do to troubleshoot
the problem?

eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:40:F4:E9:3F:3D
          inet addr:192.168.1.2  Bcast:192.168.1.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:6335 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:5026 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
          RX bytes:1373872 (1.3 Mb)  TX bytes:2199390 (2.0 Mb)
          Interrupt:16 Base address:0xf000

eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0C:76:B4:CA:82
          inet addr:AAA.BBB.CCC.164  Bcast:AAA.BBB.CCC.191
Mask:255.255.255.224
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:1582 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:2133 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
          RX bytes:100305 (97.9 Kb)  TX bytes:166007 (162.1 Kb)
          Interrupt:21 Base address:0x1000

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
          RX packets:209 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:209 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:22394 (21.8 Kb)  TX bytes:22394 (21.8 Kb)


Thanks!

2.Two NICs - Two Networks - No Clue

Hi, 

Hopefully I will make this concise. I'm setting up Server 2003 to function 
as a GhostCast server (PXE). I would like this to be completely separate from 
our Active Directory network as the Ghosting process adversely affects 
traffic.  Yet, I would still like to be able to access the WWW through our AD 
network. 

I've currenlty got two NICs in the server with the IPs hard-coded. One NIC 
is connected to a switch for the Ghosting and the other NIC is connected to 
the AD and cannot access the WWW.  What am I doing wrong? 

If anyone could point me in the right direction, I would greatly appreciate 
it. 

Jeremy

3.Server 2003 two nics two networks

We have multiple servers (2003) with two NICs.  In each machine, one
NIC is configured with a public IP and one with a 10.x.  Our lab
machines are all on the 10.x network.  The idea is that the lab
machines communicate via the 10.x to our servers.  However, they are
also supposed to be able to connec to the Net.  They go through a
router that has a private and a public interface for this purpuse.
However, I am finding that my servers are getting to portions (if not
all) of my public network via their private interfaces, through this
router, and on.  The effect - my router "poisons" my campus router such
that other computers on my public network cannot see my servers.  I
believe that what happens is that a computer on the public network goes
through our campus router to get to the server's public IP but the
campus router reports the MAC of my private router - it then discards
the traffic.  Anyhow, my assumption was that with any Windows Server
machine with two NICs with two networks would logically say: if this
packet is destined for 10.x go out my NIC with that network address.
If this packet is destined for a public IP go out my NIC with a public
IP address.  Is this logic wrong?  If so, what is the reason?  If my
logic is correct, what would cause my servers to violate this logic?  I
am more than willing to read whatever necessary if someone wants to
simply point me in the right direction.

Thanks

4.Two NICs / Two Networks / One Machine

Here's the situation:  I have both DSL (pokey 800k) and Cable (2500k, usually) broadband modems in my SOHO.  I'd like to have both of these hooked up, not to run in a "Dual WAN" mode, but in an "either/or" mode

Is this possible


5.two dsl connections, two routers, dual nics on linux box , want to run two websites

Hello,

I have two dsl connections, with one public ip on each. I have a linux
box with two nic cards.

xx.xx.xx.xx(WAN)---ROUTER(LAN23.123.45.110) ---- MYLINUX
(23.123.45.107) eth1
yy.yy.yy.yy(WAN)---ROUTER(LAN192.182.1.1)   ---- MYLINUX
(192.168.1.100) eth0

I have apache listening on both interfaces. 

Problem:

1. How do I make the packets route back to the gateway from which they
originate.

Currently the gateway marked as "default" is able to serve content
from the apache. The other one cannot.

I tried adding static routes, but that didn't work.

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks
Jay

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref   
Use Iface
adsl-23-123-45- adsl-23-123-45- 255.255.255.255 UGH   0      0       
0 eth1
23.123.45.0     *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0       
0 eth1
192.168.1.0     *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0       
0 eth0
loopback        *               255.0.0.0       U     0      0       
0 lo
default         192.168.1.1     0.0.0.0         UG    1      0       
0 eth0


eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0D:87:57:A0:DE
          inet addr:192.168.1.100  Bcast:192.168.1.255 
Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:3060612 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:3577217 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
          RX bytes:1566982235 (1494.3 Mb)  TX bytes:1126616733 (1074.4
Mb)
          Interrupt:11 Base address:0xe000

eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:40:05:39:0E:EA
          inet addr:23.123.45.107  Bcast:68.123.24.255 
Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:90635 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:31082 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
          RX bytes:23017102 (21.9 Mb)  TX bytes:13283751 (12.6 Mb)
          Interrupt:11 Base address:0xe000

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
          RX packets:11888 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:11888 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:6920794 (6.6 Mb)  TX bytes:6920794 (6.6 Mb)

6. Servers with two NICS and two networks

7. Two NICs And Two Separate Networks?

8. Two NICs & Two Separate Networks?



Return to Windows

 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guest