Highly unofficial NVidia 168.18 whql

windows 64bit

    Sponsored Links

    Next

  • 1. Sandra
    SiSsoft Sandra has a native 64 bit version out.(excellent system info program).Works well in 64 bit
  • 2. uphclean by Robin carron
    seems to work fine in 64 bit uphclean.exe (-users profile hive cleanup services). Available from microsoft, link in their download notification news-letter. Just loaded it in 64 bit. Loaded it last night in 32 & it seems to have made my system faster...waiting to see if any changes or improvements in 64 bit.
  • 3. x64 Installation BSOD
    Thank you in advance for your help. When I attempt to install x64 I get past the part where it loads the drivers and I think it says Windows Setup at the bottom bar. Right after that the screen goes blank and then the blue screen comes up with the STOP: PROCESS1_INITIALIZATION_FAILED error. I am running an Athlon 64 X2, on an n-force4 mobo with an nvidia 7800 video card. I have a single 100 GB IDE HDD. I have tried the following troubleshooting steps with the exact same results: *Updated all firmware. *Removed all non-essential components. *Removed all but one stick of ram. *Formatted HDD *Hit F6 during pre-install and provided n-force IDE drivers. *Asked it to work very very nicely. Any assistance you folks can offer will be appreciated.
  • 4. TV Tuner Card
    Can anyone please recommend a TV Tuner card that has drivers compatible with win 64? Thx -- websledder_____________*
  • 5. Upgrading Server 200 and Setup cannot find the Hard Disk?
    Hello there I'm attempting to upgrade my Server 2000 to Server2003x64 - without any luck and would appreciate your advice. I've booted the CD and pressed F6 to load drivers from floppy. After selecting the latest x64 drivers from Silicon Image I proceed to the install Windows screen. I select Install Windows and the next screen inform that the Hard disk is not found and I can only press F3 to exit. here is the spec: mb: gigabyte ga-k8n Pro(nforce3 chipset) processor: amd athlon 64 3400 memory: 2 * 1gb TwinX Corsair hd: wd 160gb sata-II os: windows 2000 sp4

Highly unofficial NVidia 168.18 whql

Postby Q2FybG9z » Sat, 14 Jul 2007 07:10:01 GMT

The french guys of www.station-drivers.com did it again.
They have unofficial (allegedly whql) drivers v168.18 for both Vista and XP 
x64.
 http://www.**--****.com/ %20forceware.htm
 http://www.**--****.com/ (www.station-drivers.com).exe
 http://www.**--****.com/ (www.station-drivers.com).exe
Downloading them right now.
Use it at your own risk (or just don't use it).
Carlos

RE: Highly unofficial NVidia 168.18 whql

Postby Q2FybG9z » Sat, 14 Jul 2007 08:06:00 GMT

Sorry, 162.18!
Carlos





Re: Highly unofficial NVidia 168.18 whql

Postby jabloomf1230 » Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:21:28 GMT

Carlos,

They also have 162.22 for Vista x86 and Vista x64, which is slightly 
newer. Guru3d has 163.11 for Vista x86 and Vista x64, but these drivers 
only work with the NVidia 8xxx series cards.

Jay




Re: Highly unofficial NVidia 168.18 whql

Postby Dominic Payer » Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:56:44 GMT

162.18 for XP/2000 x86 and 162.22 for Vista x86 and x64 are official nVidia 
beta drivers.

See  http://www.**--****.com/ 










Re: Highly unofficial NVidia 168.18 whql

Postby Q2FybG9z » Sat, 14 Jul 2007 19:16:02 GMT

Guys:
Let me stress this.
These are NOT beta.
They are whql.
Once you extract the exe file you will be able to see the "catalog" file 
(*cat.) which is the "mark" of being whql.
They have the same numbering of other betas around there but they are not 
beta.
Then again, use at your own risk.
I have not still decided what I am going to do with them.
Carlos








Re: Highly unofficial NVidia 168.18 whql

Postby Kue2 » Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:03:00 GMT

Hi Guys
The 162.22 version is for Nvidia series 6,7,8 series cards
I have this version loaded in Vista 64.
So far so good,no errors.Time will be the big test.












Re: Highly unofficial NVidia 168.18 whql

Postby John Barnes » Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:15:24 GMT

Thanks.  I downloaded them from the nVidia site but have not installed yet.














Re: Highly unofficial NVidia 168.18 whql

Postby Kue2 » Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:16:55 GMT

Well so much for that test(162.22).I still get the error (nvlddmkm.sys 
error)system has recovered. Back to the original driver that does not 
produce that error. Nvidia Driver version 7.15.10 9746 dated 22/08/2006.















Re: Highly unofficial NVidia 168.18 whql

Postby Q2FybG9z » Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:12:01 GMT

Hi:
Finally downloaded and successfully installed in Vista x64 the 162.18's from 
the source mentioned at the top of my post.
I can confirm (and so does Vista) that the drivers are not beta.
They are digitally signed.
Date is June 29th, and version is 7.15.11.6218
No problems so far.
Carlos















Similar Threads:

1.NVidia 160.04's whql for Vista x64, unofficial

2.NVidia 160.04's whql Vista x64, unofficial

3.New unofficial ATI Catalyst 5.11 drivers whql

4.Unofficial ATI 7.7's whql

5.New nVidia GeForce WHQL Release 175.16 -- 13 May 2008

Nice drivers..... Too bad they don't offer 1920X1200 as a resolution fo
my monitor. I went back to 175.63 beta drivers that DO offer 1920X1200
Native resolution looks much better than 1680X1050 which is as high a
the 175.16's go

Ultimate 64 QX6700 Badaxe2 4Gigs Corsair 6400 8800GTX 768 6X 500Gig  2
160Gig Rosewill 950watt PSU BenQ 24in LCD

6. WHQL certification on latest nvidia Vista64 drivers should be revoked

7. FYI: NVIDIA Releases WHQL Drivers for Windows Vista

8. NVIDIA Releases WHQL Drivers for Windows Vista



Return to windows 64bit

 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 88 guest