Servers with two NICS and two networks

WINDOWS SERVER

    Next

  • 1. FTP conn issue between 2 servers.
    Am trying to backup some files using HandyBackup between two win2003 servers via the internet. I get a "Socket error = #10060" when I try to FTP from a remote 2003 server to a local 2003 server . The local 2003 server works fine all the time from other remote XP pro clients using CuteFTP. I tried PASV and non-PASV modes from the remote server but still cannot connect.. When I restart the RAS at both servers, it works for a short time, but later fails.. Also tried using Serv-U FTP server at the local server- same thing.. Both servers are using DHCP and RAS w/2 NIC's. Anyone have any suggestions as to is going on? Thanks Jim
  • 2. Reverse Lookup queries outside of windows DNS
    I currently have all of our windows environment on AD DNS. However I have devices that are not in windows or joined to AD and are registered in an another DNS structure in the company. I have forwarding setup to forward lookups to the other DNS structure if the record is not hosted in AD DNS. Those are working fine. It does not seem to forward the reverse queries. My question is what are my options to getting the reverse lookups to work for these devices that are not registered in AD DNS. Thanks for any help!
  • 3. SBS2003 - can't delete reserved IP
    When I try to delete reserved IP it seems like everthing is OK, but when I make refresh reservation is back. :-( The same thing happens in cmd prompt ... here is copy ... netsh dhcp server scope>delete reservedip 192.168.133.22 00-03-1b-58-c8-aa- Command completed successfully. netsh dhcp server scope>show reservedip =============================================================== Reservation Address - Unique ID =============================================================== 192.168.133.25 - 00-00-85-80-47-1e- 192.168.133.26 - 00-80-87-4b-9e-ab- 192.168.133.22 - 00-03-1b-58-c8-aa- 192.168.133.28 - 00-00-85-80-46-c4- No of ReservedIPs : 4 in the Scope : 192.168.133.0. Command completed successfully. netsh dhcp server scope>
  • 4. TcpWindowSize Global or Per Interface?
    Is the TCP Windows size set globally for all interfaces? The Microsoft Windows 2003 Performance Tuning Guidelines document says TcpWindowSize is set at location: \\HKLM\system\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\TcpWindowSize This seems odd considering that TcpAckFrequency is set per interface, for example inside of: \\HKLM\system\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\Interfaces\{999...999} -- Will

Servers with two NICS and two networks

Postby c3Zlcm5l » Thu, 14 Jan 2010 02:24:01 GMT

I have 8 servers with 100 desktops attached.  The servers connect to a 1gb 
switch that feeds all the desktops.  There is a firewall attached to the 
switch that provides Internet connection.  All pretty standard stuff = IP is 
10.10.1.0 to 10.10.5.0 with mask of 255.255.252.0.   

I have a tape drive in one server that backs up data from the other servers. 
 Since all the servers have two NICs, I was hoping I could setup a separate 
address range for those NICs and let the backup use that NIC and not flood 
the other with traffic.  

I can set the second NICs to be 172.16.1.1 172.16.1.250 range with mask of 
255.255.255.0.  I would put in a new 1gb switch that just connects the second 
NICs (switch is cheap enough and no need to burden other switch with VLANs).  

What would I need to also configure on the servers so it knows that traffic 
destined for the other servers use the 172.16.x.x range and not the 10.10.x.x 
range?  What other settings do I need to know about?  

Is this config going to make a difference in inter-server communication 
(speed)?



Re: Servers with two NICS and two networks

Postby Ace Fekay [MVP-DS, MCT] » Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:24:44 GMT

"Phillip Windell" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > wrote in message
news:% XXXX@XXXXX.COM ...


Phil,

My blog has a compiled synopsis of multihomed domain controllers
(implications, why it happens and options to alter the DCs to make it work).
I hope the original poster, "sverne" finds it helpful.

Multihomed DCs with DNS, RRAS, multiple IPs, and/or PPPoE adapters
http://msmvps.com/blogs/acefekay/archive/2009/08/17/multihomed-dcs-with-dns-rras-and-or-pppoe-adapters.aspx


--
Ace

This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties or guarantees and
confers no rights.

Please reply back to the newsgroup or forum for collaboration benefit among
responding engineers, and to help others benefit from your resolution.

Ace Fekay, MVP, MCT, MCITP EA, MCTS Windows 2008 & Exchange 2007, MCSE &
MCSA 2003/2000, MCSA Messaging 2003
Microsoft Certified Trainer
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services

If you feel this is an urgent issue and require immediate assistance, please
contact Microsoft PSS directly. Please check http://support.microsoft.com
for regional support phone numbers.



Re: Servers with two NICS and two networks

Postby Phillip Windell » Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:40:02 GMT

Yea, I need to add that link to my list and include it i posts like that.


-- 
Phillip Windell

The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------



Re: Servers with two NICS and two networks

Postby Ace Fekay [MVP-DS, MCT] » Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:48:46 GMT





Thanks. I may update it adding the links you supplied to the Related LInks 
section. Thanks for posting those links, too. :-)

Ace




Re: Servers with two NICS and two networks

Postby Phillip Windell » Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:58:04 GMT

Here's a few more that are "semi" related.  They have to do with when you 
might want multiple Default Gateways in a "correct" situation.  Not saying 
that I would like the scenario, but just being honest in that it does exist.

Load balance two Internet connections
 http://www.**--****.com/ 

128978 - Dead Gateway Detection in TCP/IP for Windows NT
 http://www.**--****.com/ ;EN-US;128978

171564 - TCP/IP Dead Gateway Detection Algorithm Updated for Windows NT
 http://www.**--****.com/ ;EN-US;171564


Then there is this one:

An explanation of the Automatic Metric feature for Internet Protocol routes
 http://www.**--****.com/ 

People might find them useful I guess.
Some are old,..don't know when MS might rearange things and break the links.

-- 
Phillip Windell

The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------



Re: Servers with two NICS and two networks

Postby Ace Fekay [MVP-DS, MCT] » Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:05:06 GMT





Some of them only apply to a non-server, such as 299540. That would be 
helpful in those cases. I usually try to steer away from multihoming 
anything unless I have to, but as a rule, never a DC.

Ace




Similar Threads:

1.Server 2003 two nics two networks

We have multiple servers (2003) with two NICs.  In each machine, one
NIC is configured with a public IP and one with a 10.x.  Our lab
machines are all on the 10.x network.  The idea is that the lab
machines communicate via the 10.x to our servers.  However, they are
also supposed to be able to connec to the Net.  They go through a
router that has a private and a public interface for this purpuse.
However, I am finding that my servers are getting to portions (if not
all) of my public network via their private interfaces, through this
router, and on.  The effect - my router "poisons" my campus router such
that other computers on my public network cannot see my servers.  I
believe that what happens is that a computer on the public network goes
through our campus router to get to the server's public IP but the
campus router reports the MAC of my private router - it then discards
the traffic.  Anyhow, my assumption was that with any Windows Server
machine with two NICs with two networks would logically say: if this
packet is destined for 10.x go out my NIC with that network address.
If this packet is destined for a public IP go out my NIC with a public
IP address.  Is this logic wrong?  If so, what is the reason?  If my
logic is correct, what would cause my servers to violate this logic?  I
am more than willing to read whatever necessary if someone wants to
simply point me in the right direction.

Thanks

2.two dsl connections, two routers, dual nics on linux box , want to run two websites

Hello,

I have two dsl connections, with one public ip on each. I have a linux
box with two nic cards.

xx.xx.xx.xx(WAN)---ROUTER(LAN23.123.45.110) ---- MYLINUX
(23.123.45.107) eth1
yy.yy.yy.yy(WAN)---ROUTER(LAN192.182.1.1)   ---- MYLINUX
(192.168.1.100) eth0

I have apache listening on both interfaces. 

Problem:

1. How do I make the packets route back to the gateway from which they
originate.

Currently the gateway marked as "default" is able to serve content
from the apache. The other one cannot.

I tried adding static routes, but that didn't work.

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks
Jay

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref   
Use Iface
adsl-23-123-45- adsl-23-123-45- 255.255.255.255 UGH   0      0       
0 eth1
23.123.45.0     *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0       
0 eth1
192.168.1.0     *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0       
0 eth0
loopback        *               255.0.0.0       U     0      0       
0 lo
default         192.168.1.1     0.0.0.0         UG    1      0       
0 eth0


eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0D:87:57:A0:DE
          inet addr:192.168.1.100  Bcast:192.168.1.255 
Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:3060612 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:3577217 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
          RX bytes:1566982235 (1494.3 Mb)  TX bytes:1126616733 (1074.4
Mb)
          Interrupt:11 Base address:0xe000

eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:40:05:39:0E:EA
          inet addr:23.123.45.107  Bcast:68.123.24.255 
Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:90635 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:31082 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
          RX bytes:23017102 (21.9 Mb)  TX bytes:13283751 (12.6 Mb)
          Interrupt:11 Base address:0xe000

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
          RX packets:11888 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:11888 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:6920794 (6.6 Mb)  TX bytes:6920794 (6.6 Mb)

3.Two NICs, Two networks, secure websites

Hi!

I have a Cisco router (provided by the ISP) that offers 29 usable IP's.
 One of the public IP's is set to be the WAN IP of a simple SOHO
Linksys router that then creates a private network 192.168.1.0.  There
is a Linux server with Apache on the private network.  Port forwarding
on the Linksys router allows SSL access to secure web pages,
unencrypted HTTP, SSH, etc. to the Linux server.  This all is working
OK.

I need to have a 2nd SSL site running on the same Linux server.  So, I
installed a 2nd NIC and connected it to the Cisco router and used one
of the available public IP's.  I cannot connect to the new public IP
(via the new NIC), but can still connect to everything described in the
1st paragraph above.

I can ping out each of the interfaces (e.g. ping -I eth0 yahoo.com  and
  ping -I eth1 yahoo.com both work).  The results of route are:

Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
Iface
AAA.BBB.CCC.160 *               255.255.255.224 U     0      0        0
eth1
192.168.1.0     *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0
eth0
127.0.0.0       *               255.0.0.0       U     0      0        0
lo
default         192.168.1.1     0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0
eth0

On the server, I can do   lynx https://192.168.1.2 and lynx
https://AAA.BBB.CCC.164.

>From outside of the server, https://AAA.BBB.CCC.163 works now, but
https://AAA.BBB.CCC.164 does not.  What needs to be done to allow
https://AAA.BBB.CCC.164 to work?  And/or, what can I do to troubleshoot
the problem?

eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:40:F4:E9:3F:3D
          inet addr:192.168.1.2  Bcast:192.168.1.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:6335 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:5026 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
          RX bytes:1373872 (1.3 Mb)  TX bytes:2199390 (2.0 Mb)
          Interrupt:16 Base address:0xf000

eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0C:76:B4:CA:82
          inet addr:AAA.BBB.CCC.164  Bcast:AAA.BBB.CCC.191
Mask:255.255.255.224
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:1582 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:2133 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
          RX bytes:100305 (97.9 Kb)  TX bytes:166007 (162.1 Kb)
          Interrupt:21 Base address:0x1000

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
          RX packets:209 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:209 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:22394 (21.8 Kb)  TX bytes:22394 (21.8 Kb)


Thanks!

4.two nics - two networks

I have a windows 2003 server with one nic (192.168.100.x).  We just 
purchased a second company that's in our building.  Can I add a second nic 
and configure it to there network ip scheme (192.168.25.x) so that I can 
share one server?  I want to share the server, just not the information on 
the server.  Will either of the networks be able to one another if I don't 
bridge the networks cards?  Thanks for any help you can provide.

A


5.Two NICs - Two Networks - No Clue

Hi, 

Hopefully I will make this concise. I'm setting up Server 2003 to function 
as a GhostCast server (PXE). I would like this to be completely separate from 
our Active Directory network as the Ghosting process adversely affects 
traffic.  Yet, I would still like to be able to access the WWW through our AD 
network. 

I've currenlty got two NICs in the server with the IPs hard-coded. One NIC 
is connected to a switch for the Ghosting and the other NIC is connected to 
the AD and cannot access the WWW.  What am I doing wrong? 

If anyone could point me in the right direction, I would greatly appreciate 
it. 

Jeremy

6. Two NICs / Two Networks / One Machine

7. Two NICs And Two Separate Networks?

8. Two NICs & Two Separate Networks?



Return to WINDOWS SERVER

 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 81 guest